Trump Administration Issues 30% Solar Panel Import Tariff

The White House announced Monday that President Trump has issued a 30 percent year-one tariff on imported solar cells and modules.

Tariffs will decline over a four-year period. The first 2.5 gigawatts of imported cells are excluded from the additional tariff in each of those four years, according to the U.S. Trade Representative fact sheet.

The USTR noted that China’s industrial planning “has included a focus on increasing Chinese capacity and production of solar cells and modules, using state incentives, subsidies, and tariffs to dominate the global supply chain.”

As a result of these state-directed initiatives, China’s share of global solar cell production skyrocketed from 7 percent in 2005 to 61 percent in 2012. China currently produces 60 percent of the world’s solar cells and 71 percent of solar modules, according to the fact sheet. Over this period, the U.S. solar manufacturing industry “almost disappeared,” the USTR stated, with 25 companies closing since 2012.

Opponents have pointed out that only 10 percent of solar imports currently come directly from China. The majority of imports today come from factories in Korea and countries in Southeast Asia, though several are run by Chinese companies.

While the administration’s fact sheet centered on China, it is not the only country affected. Section 201 trade cases are intended to apply globally, and today’s fact sheet makes no mention of tariff exemptions for specific countries or for any companies. However, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer issued a statement that he will engage in additional negotiations, which could potentially lead to tariff exclusions or changes for certain parties, as GTM previously reported.

“The U.S. Trade Representative will engage in discussions among interested parties that could lead to positive resolution of the separate antidumping and countervailing duty measures currently imposed on Chinese solar products and U.S. polysilicon,” the statement reads. “The goal of those discussions must be fair and sustainable trade throughout the whole solar energy value chain, which would benefit U.S. producers, workers, and consumers.”

GTM contacted the USTR to clarify the scope of these discussions and will update the story as new information becomes available.

Source: USTR 

U.S.-based crystalline-silicon solar PV (CSPV) manufacturers Suniva and SolarWorld Americas filed the petition last May under Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974, arguing that increased imports had caused serious injury to the domestic industry.

The U.S. International Trade Commission made an injury determination last year, followed by a set of recommended tariffs. Two commissioners agreed on a 30 percent ad valorem tariff on imported CSPV modules, to decline by 5 percentage points per year over four years, as well as a four-year tariff-rate quota that would allow for up to 1 gigawatt of tariff-free cell imports, increasing by 0.2 gigawatts per year.

The Trump administration offered a more generous cell quota. Coupled with a relatively high module tariff, the decision could incentivize manufacturers to open domestic solar module production facilities. Reports have already been circulating that Jinko Solar may open a module factory in Jacksonville, Florida.

Juergen Stein, president of SolarWorld Americas, thanked Trump and the USTR for recognizing the importance of solar manufacturing to U.S. economic and national security.

“We are still reviewing these remedies, and are hopeful they will be enough to address the import surge and to rebuild solar manufacturing in the United States,” he said. “We will work with the U.S. government to implement these remedies, including future negotiations, in the strongest way possible to benefit solar manufacturing and its thousands of American workers to ensure that U.S. solar manufacturing is world-class competitive for the long term.”

In the near term, President Trump’s decision will deal a blow to the U.S. solar market. The Solar Energy Industries Association said today’s decision will cause the loss of roughly 23,000 American jobs this year, including many in manufacturing. It’s also expected to trigger the delay or cancellation of billions of dollars in solar investments.

“While tariffs in this case will not create adequate cell or module manufacturing to meet U.S. demand, or keep foreign-owned Suniva and SolarWorld afloat, they will create a crisis in a part of our economy that has been thriving, which will ultimately cost tens of thousands of hard-working, blue-collar Americans their jobs,” said Abigail Ross Hopper, SEIA’s president and CEO.

R Street Trade Policy Counsel Clark Packard said the Trump administration’s decision is regrettable.

“The domestic solar industry has been growing at a rapid pace in recent years,” he said. “The petitioners in this case — both bankrupt firms that are majority foreign-owned — employ about 1,000 Americans, while the rest of the domestic industry employs more than 260,000 Americans up the entire value chain.”

“More good-paying jobs will be jeopardized by today’s decision than could possibly be saved by bailing out the bankrupt companies that petitioned for protection,” Packard added. “Today’s decision also will jeopardize the environment by making clean energy sources less affordable.”

According to MJ Shiao, head of Americas research for GTM Research, today’s announced tariff levels are likely to increase solar module costs by 10 to 12 cents per watt, based on current U.S. import prices of 35 to 40 cents per watt. According to a GTM Research analysisconducted last fall, a 10 cent per watt tariff is expected to slow the market by 8.3 percent.

Tony Clifford, chief development officer at Standard Solar, said Trump’s tariff decision may slow, but will not stop, the U.S. solar industry.

“The solar industry has come through worse policy decisions and will come through this one, too,” he said. “The solar industry is nothing if not resilient, and I’m confident the innovative, tough and resourceful members of the industry will find workarounds to the latest obstacle placed in solar’s path. The Solar Century is here, and not even unfair tariffs will stand in its way.”

Earlier this year, Tesla, in partnership with Panasonic, confirmed that solar panel and solar tile production is now underway at the company’s solar manufacturing facility in Buffalo, New York. This is the most recent solar cell and module production facility to open in the U.S. Nonetheless, Tesla opposed the imposition of new tariffs on imported solar products because its domestic factory is not expected to meet all of Tesla’s solar panel needs — at least not in the short run.

A company spokesperson reaffirmed today that Tesla is dedicated to making solar panels in America. “Tesla is committed to expanding its domestic manufacturing, including Gigafactory 2 in Buffalo, New York, regardless of the solar tariff decision today.”

First Solar, which makes thin-film solar panels that are not subject to tariffs on CSPV products, came out in support of the Suniva and SolarWorld case last year. The thin-film solar manufacturer saw its stock price shoot up by nearly 6 percent in after-hours trading, at the time of publication.

This story was updated to include reactions from several industry members, and to clarify that 10 percent of U.S. imports currently come from China, as well as the USTR’s plans to partake in additional negotiations.

New Tax Bill Offers Unexpected Benefits to Commercial Solar Installations

The commercial solar industry entered the holiday season with an unexpected policy gift from Washington.

The new tax plan passed by Congress introduced two provisions favorable for commercial solar installations: a reduction in the corporate tax rate and the expansion of depreciation allowances.

Unsurprisingly, there are very strong and divergent opinions on whether the tax bill will benefit society at large. This article does not attempt to address these important societal questions, but rather will solely analyze how the return on investment and net present value for commercial solar installations will change under the new tax code.

We will perform a bottom-up analysis for a hypothetical commercial project in California. Given that the new tax plan applies nationally, we expect the results are broadly representative of commercial installations across the U.S.

Reduction in tax rates

Tucked in the commercial solar developer’s Christmas stocking was a reduction in the federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, the lowest rate in almost 80 years according to data from the Tax Policy Center.

Commercial entities that go solar expect to reduce the energy they purchase from their utility, accordingly lowering bills. Lowering these bills makes the commercial entity more profitable, which increases the entity’s tax liability. The amount of tax commercial entities owe due to their increased profit can be calculated using the following formula, where ETRn is the effective tax rate in year n, d is the discount rate, and N is the system’s life in years.

A quick look at equation 1 shows that reducing the effective tax rate will lower the amount a corporation pays in taxes. The new tax plan reduces corporate tax rates by a whopping 40 percent, which significantly increases the attractiveness of going solar.

We used Aurora, a solar design software, to assess how much the corporate tax rate reduction boosts the returns of a commercial solar project. In Aurora, we designed a 366-kilowatt project in Northern California (pictured below), which is forecasted to generate approximately 570,000 kilowatt-hours per year.

We did not have precise interval energy consumption data for this building, so we used Aurora’s energy load profiler to estimate an annual energy consumption of 1,581,000 kilowatt-hoursConsequently, our installation is forecasted to offset about 36 percent of the building’s energy consumption.

Here are a few additional assumptions used when calculating the financial returns of the project:

  • System cost of $3/watt — the median price of commercial solar, according to Aurora’s database.
  • The system was purchased outright with cash — this simplifying assumption allows us to ignore the tax effects of loan interest payments.
  • Commercial entity was on Pacific Gas and Electric’s A-10 TOU Primary utility rate.

Depreciation: five-year MACRS, with a 50 percent bonus depreciation taken at the federal (but not state) level. We will later be assessing the effect of the change in depreciation rules.

Below are the complete financial simulations assumptions for the California commercial installation.

These assumptions allowed us to isolate the effects of lowering the federal corporate tax rate to 21 percent from 35 percent, while the state income tax rate remains unchanged at 8.84 percent. The table below shows the effect of the 14 percentage point reduction in federal corporate tax rates.

Our analysis shows that the reduction in tax rates will increase the rate of return by about 2 percent per year. Over time, this adds up: The total value of the project increases by 19 percent, which for this project amounts to over $140,000.

If you are a commercial solar developer who had a project rejected on economic grounds this year, you now have a New Year’s resolution: calling back those CFOs with updated figures.

Expanded bonus depreciation

If the reduction in corporate tax rates wasn’t enough to get the industry’s bells jingling, Congress also added the benefit of doubling the amount of bonus depreciation that can be claimed on commercial solar projects.

For background, depreciation is a way to allocate the cost of a large capital investment over time, such as a new solar installation. Prior to the passage of the new tax plan, Congress allowed you to depreciate 50 percent of a new asset’s value during its first year of operation.

In the commercial solar industry, the remaining 50 percent of the asset’s value is typically depreciated over five and a half years using a technique called the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS). Until the new tax plan, the amount of bonus depreciation was scheduled to decrease to 40 percent of the system cost in 2018, and down to 30 percent in 2019.

Why would you want to spread the cost of a solar installation that is forecasted to last 25 years over only six years?

When calculating a company’s profits, depreciation is considered an expense, meaning it lowers the profits that you report for your taxes. Commercial entities generally prefer to avoid paying taxes as soon as possible, as opposed to waiting for a future period to avoid. This makes a shorter depreciation schedule attractive to corporations: They can claim their tax savings today as opposed to in the future.

Mathematically, the depreciation tax savings can be computed as follows:

With the new tax bill, Congress increased the bonus depreciation to 100 percent, meaning one can essentially deduct the entire cost of the system in the first year of operation.

Let’s return to our California project to analyze the impact of this depreciation tax reduction on solar returns. In order to isolate the effects of doubling the bonus depreciation from the general reduction in tax rates, we assumed a federal corporate tax rate of 35 percent and a state tax rate of 8.84 percent. The table below show the results of our analysis.

Once again, we find that the new tax rules help boost the return of commercial solar installations. Indeed, the total value of the project increases by over 6 percent.

Total return

So far, we have analyzed the economic effects of reducing tax rates and doubling the bonus depreciation separately. Each provision of the controversial new tax plan increases the financial return of commercial solar installations.

Let’s revisit our California site to evaluate how much the financial returns of commercial projects will change now that we’re in 2018.

A 27 percent increase in project value should have commercial solar salespeople fa la la la la-ing as they plan for the rest of 2018.


Samuel Adeyemo is the chief operating officer at Aurora Solar. Aurora’s solar design software is used to design and sell over 50,000 solar installations per month.

EcoWise Power
© Copyright 2018 - EcoWise Power, 1214 43rd Street Des Moines, IA 50311 - Phone: 515-523-0057